DSP Meeting Results 2012

Below are the results of the 2012 MSBA Designer Selection Panel ("DSP") meetings. The results are displayed in descending order, starting with the results from the most recent DSP meeting.

DSP Meeting Results:

Meeting Date: December 18, 2012

Boston, MA – Dearborn School

Applications review at the December 18, 2012 DSP meeting resulted in the following unranked list of applicants:

  • Jonathan Levi Architects LLC
  • Leers Weinzapfel Associates Architects, Inc.
  • Symmes Maini & McKee Associates, Inc.

There will be interviews for the Dearborn School, Boston, MA at the Tuesday, January 8, 2013 DSP meeting.

There were no informational interviews at this meeting.

DSP Meeting Results:

Meeting Date: October 16, 2012

Athol-Royalston Regional School District – Riverbend Elementary School

Applications review at the October 2, 2012 DSP meeting and finalist interviews at the October 16, 2012 DSP meeting resulted in the following ranking of applicants:

  1. Mount Vernon Group Architects, Inc.
  2. Flansburgh Associates, Inc.
  3. OMR Architects, Inc.

There were no informational interviews at this meeting.

DSP Meeting Results:

Meeting Date: October 2, 2012

Newton, MA –  A.E. Angier Elementary School

Applications review at the September 18, 2012 DSP meeting and finalist interviews at the October 2, 2012 DSP meeting resulted in the following ranking of applicants:

  1. DiNisco Design Partnership, Limited
  2. HMFH Architects, Inc.
  3. Mount Vernon Group Architects, Inc. (as determined at the September 18, 2012 DSP meeting)

Athol-Royalston Regional School District – Riverbend Elementary School

Applications review at the October 2, 2012 DSP meeting resulted in the following unranked list of applicants:

  • Flansburgh Associates, Inc.
  • Mount Vernon Group Architects, Inc.
  • OMR Architects, Inc.

There will be interviews for the proposed Riverbend Elementary School, Athol, MA at the Tuesday, October 16, 2012 DSP meeting.

There were no informational interviews at this meeting.

DSP Meeting Results:

Meeting Date: September 18, 2012

Newton – A.E. Angier Elementary School

Applications review at the September 18, 2012 DSP meeting resulted in the following unranked list of applicants:

  • DiNisco Design Partnership, Ltd.
  • HMFH Architects, Inc.

There will be interviews for the A.E. Angier Elementary School project at the Tuesday, October 2, 2012 meeting.

There were no informational interviews at this meeting. 

DSP Meeting Results: 

Meeting Date: August 28, 2012

Lynn, MA – Thurgood Marshall Middle School

Applications review at the July 24, 2012 DSP meeting and Finalist Interviews at the August 28, 2012 DSP meeting resulted in the following ranking of applicants:

  1. Raymond Design Associates, Inc.
  2. Tappé Associates, Inc.
  3. Mount Vernon Group Architects, Inc.

DSP Meeting Results:

Meeting Date: July 24, 2012

Lynn, MA – Thurgood Marshall Middle School

Applications review at the July 24, 2012 DSP meeting resulted in the following unranked list of applicants:

  • Raymond Design Associates, Inc.
  • Tappé Associates, Inc.

There will be interviews for the proposed Thurgood Marshall Middle School project at the Tuesday, August 28, 2012 DSP meeting.

There were informational interviews with the following firms:

  • Stantec
  • Tai Soo Kim Partners Architects

DSP Meeting Results:

Meeting Date: June 5, 2012

Accelerated Repair Designer Applications Review

Applications review resulted in the following recommendation of applicants for the Accelerated Repair Program:

Roof, Window, and Boiler
CSS Architects, Inc.
DiMarinisi & Wolfe Architects
Habeeb & Associates Architects, Inc.
Icon Architecture, Inc.
Knight, Bagge & Anderson, Inc.
Reinhardt Associates, Inc.
Turowski2 Architecture, Inc.

Roof and Window Only
CBI Consulting, Inc.
Gale Associates, Inc.
Kaestle Boos Associates, Inc.
Raymond Design Associates, Inc.
Russo Barr Associates, Inc.

Boiler Only
BLW Engineers, Inc.
Garcia Galuska DeSousa, Inc.
Lindgren & Sharples, P.C.
RDK Engineers
Shekar & Associates

The MSBA will assign a Designer from one of the above three groups to each Accelerated Repair project. There is no guarantee that a Designer in any of the above three groups will be assigned to any particular number of Accelerated Repair projects or to any Accelerated Repair project at all. The MSBA may assign more than one Accelerated Repair project to a Designer. The grouping and selection of Designers described above is solely for the purposes of the Accelerated Repair Program.

DSP Meeting Results:

Meeting Date: May 22, 2012

Winthrop, MA – Winthrop High School

Applications review at the May 22, 2012 DSP meeting resulted in the following ranking of applicants:

  1. HMFH Architects, Inc.
  2. DiNisco Design Partnership, Ltd.
  3. Flansburgh Associates, Inc.

There were no informational interviews.

DSP Meeting Results:

Meeting Date: May 8, 2012

Science Laboratory Initiative

Applications review at the May 8, 2012 DSP meeting resulted in the following grouping of applicants for the Science Laboratory Initiative:
 
Group A
Ai3 Architects, LLC
DiNisco Design Partnership, Ltd.
Flansburgh Associates, Inc.
Kaestle-Boos Associates, Inc.
Lamoureux Pagano Associates, Inc.
Symmes Maini & McKee Associates
 
Group B
Design Partnership of Cambridge, Inc.
Mount Vernon Group Architects, Inc.
Tappé Associates, Inc.
 
Group C
Cannon Design
DAI, Inc.
Habeeb & Associates, Inc.
JCJ Architecture, PC
Knight, Bagge & Anderson, Inc.
Lavallee Brensinger Architects
Raymond Design Associates, Inc.
Richard D. Kimball Company, Inc.
Tetra Tech Architects & Engineers
The S/L/A/M Collaborative
 
In addition, the DSP voted unanimously to disqualify the following applicants as it was determined that their submissions were non-responsive to the requirements of the Request for Services:
 
CSS Architects, Inc.
Edward Rowse Architects, Inc.
Watermark Environmental, Inc.
 
MSBA staff will assign a Designer to each Science Laboratory Initiative (SLI) project. In assigning Designers to SLI projects, the MSBA will first consider the Designers in Group A. If at any time the MSBA believes that the designer resources available in Group A cannot fulfill the objectives of the SLI, the MSBA may assign a Designer from Group B. If at any time the MSBA believes that the designer resources available in Group A and Group B cannot fulfill the objectives of the SLI, the MSBA may assign a Designer from Group C. There is no guarantee that a Designer in any of the three groups will be selected for any SLI project. The MSBA may assign more than one SLI project to a Designer. The grouping and selection of Designers described above is solely for purposes of the SLI.
 

DSP Meeting Results:

Meeting Date: April 24, 2012

Revere, MA – William McKinley Elementary School

Applications review at the April 24, 2012 DSP meeting resulted in the following ranking of applicants:

  1. Drummey Rosane Anderson, Inc.
  2. Flansburgh Associates, Inc.
  3. JCJ Architecture, PC

There were informational interviews with the following firms:

  • Raymond Design Associates, Inc.
  • HKT Architects, Inc.

DSP Meeting Results:

Meeting Date: March 27, 2012

Wachusett Regional School District – Mountview Middle School

Applications review at the March 27, 2012 DSP meeting resulted in the following ranking of applicants:

  1. Lamoureux Pagano & Associates, Inc.
  2. Flansburgh Associates, Inc.
  3. Design Partnership of Cambridge, Inc.

There were informational interviews with the following firms:

  • LaVallee Brensinger Architects
  • Clarke & Green, Inc.

DSP Meeting Results:

Meeting Date: March 13, 2012

Spencer-East Brookfield Regional School District – David Prouty High School

Applications review at the February 28, 2012 DSP meeting and interviews at the March 13, 2012 DSP meeting resulted in the following ranking of applicants:

  1. Design Partnership of Cambridge, Inc.
  2. ARC/Architectural Resources Cambridge, Inc. 
  3. Lamoureux Pagano & Associates, Inc. (as determined at the Feb. 28, 2012 DSP meeting)

Berkshire Hills Regional School District – Monument Mountain Regional High School

Applications review at the February 28, 2012 DSP meeting and interviews at the March 13, 2012 resulted in the following ranking of applicants: 

  1. Symmes Maini & McKee Associates, Inc.
  2. Tetra Tech Architects & Engineers
  3. Flansburgh Associates, Inc.

DSP Meeting Results:

Meeting Date: February 28, 2012

Chicopee, MA  – Chicopee Academy

Applications review at the January 24, 2012 DSP meeting and interviews at the February 28, 2012 DSP meeting resulted in the following ranking of applicants:

  1. Caolo & Bieniek Associates, Inc.
  2. Drummey Rosane Anderson, Inc.
  3. Lamoureux Pagano & Associates, Inc.

Berkshire Hills Regional School District – Monument Mountain Regional High School

Applications review at the February 28, 2012 DSP meeting resulted in the following unranked list of applicants: 

  • Flansburgh Associates, Inc.
  • Symmes Maini & McKee Associates, Inc.
  • Tetra Tech Architects & Engineers 

There will be interviews for the proposed Monument Mountain Regional High School project at the Tuesday, March 13, 2012 DSP meeting.

Spencer-East Brookfield Regional School District – David Prouty High School

Applications review at the February 28, 2012 DSP meeting resulted in the following unranked list of applicants:

  • ARC/Architectural Resources Cambridge, Inc.
  • Design Partnership of Cambridge, Inc.

There will be interviews for the proposed David Prouty High School project at the Tuesday, March 13, 2012 DSP meeting.

DSP Meeting Results:

Meeting Date: February 7, 2012

Whitman-Hanson Regional School District – Maquan Elementary School

Applications review at the January 10, 2012 DSP meeting and interviews at the February 7, 2012 DSP meeting resulted in the following ranking of applicants:

  1. Turowski2 Architecture, Inc.
  2. Raymond Design Associates, Inc.
  3. Fletcher Thompson Architecture Engineering, LLC

Winchester, MA – Winchester High School

Applications review at the January 10, 2012 DSP meeting and interviews at the February 7, 2012 DSP meeting resulted in the following ranking of applicants:

  1. Symmes Maini & McKee Associates, Inc.
  2. Tappé Associates, Inc.
  3. Flansburgh Associates, Inc.

There were no informational interviews at this meeting.

DSP Meeting Results:

Meeting Date: January 24, 2012

Auburn, MA – Auburn Middle School

Applications review at the December 20, 2011 DSP meeting and interviews at the January 24, 2012 DSP meeting resulted in the following ranking of applicants:

  1. Lamoureux Pagano & Associates, Inc.
  2. OMR Architects, Inc.
  3. ARC/Architectural Resources Cambridge

Chicopee, MA – Chicopee Academy

Applications review at the January 24, 2012 DSP meeting resulted in the following unranked list of applicants:

  • Caolo & Bieniek Associates, Inc.
  • Drummey Rosane Anderson, Inc.
  • Lamoureux Pagano & Associates, Inc.

There will be interviews for the proposed Chicopee Academy project at the February 28, 2012 DSP meeting.

There were no informational interviews at this meeting.

 

 

DSP Meeting Results:

Meeting Date: January 10, 2012

Newburyport, MA – R.A. Nock/E.G. Molin School

Applications review at the December 20, 2011 DSP meeting and interviews at the January 10, 2012 DSP meeting resulted in the following ranking of applicants:

  1. Miller Dyer Spears, Inc.
  2. Symmes Maini & McKee Associates, Inc.
  3. Flansburgh Associates, Inc.

Winchester, MA – Winchester High School

Applications review at the January 10, 2012 DSP meeting resulted in the following unranked list of applicants:

  • Symmes Maini & McKee Associates, Inc.
  • Tappé Associates, Inc.

There will be interviews for the proposed Winchester High School project at the Tuesday, February 7, 2012 DSP meeting.

Whitman-Hanson Regional School District – Maquan Elementary School

Application review at the January 10, 2012 DSP meeting resulted in the following unranked list of applicants:

  • Fletcher Thompson Architecture Engineering, LLC
  • Raymond Design Associates, Inc.
  • Turowski2 Architecture, Inc.

There will be interviews for the proposed Maquan Elementary School project at the Tuesday, February 7, 2012 DSP meeting.

 

DSP Meeting Results: